Return to Book Page. Preview — Orthodox and Modern by Bruce L.
Orthodox and Modern: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth - Bruce L. McCormack - Google Книги
Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth 4. McCormack begins with Barth's relation to nineteenth-century theologians and then turns to critique the works of contemporary authors within postmodern circles who have attempted to reinterpret Barth to fit their categories. The later sections of McCormack's study probe more deeply into Barth's theology and consider European perspectives. As the title affirms, McCormack suggests that Barth was, in fact, both orthodox and modern in his theology.
McCormack has established a reputation as a thoughtful scholar, and his study of Barth will certainly find a broad audience in academic circles. But serious readers and clergy will also find it a helpful guide to Barth's theology and his continuing importance. Paperback , pages. Published October 1st by Baker Academic first published September 1st To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Orthodox and Modern , please sign up.
Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Dec 24, Jacob Aitken rated it it was amazing Shelves: Bruce McCormack suggests that the best model for understanding Karl Barth's theology is Realdialektik--God is indirectly identical with the medium of his self-revelation. It is dialectical in the sense that it posits both a veiling and unveiling of God.
- Orthodox and Modern: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth – Theology Forum.
- La casa de Bernarda Alba (Spanish Edition).
- Parkinson (German Edition).
- Orthodox and Modern: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth by Bruce L. McCormack.
God is unveiled in Jesus's flesh, but since it is in Jesus's flesh, God is in a sense veiled McCormack This is another way of using Luther's Deus absconditus. Interestingly, this dialectic solves the postmodern problem of "Presence-Absence Bruce McCormack suggests that the best model for understanding Karl Barth's theology is Realdialektik--God is indirectly identical with the medium of his self-revelation.
Interestingly, this dialectic solves the postmodern problem of "Presence-Absence.
- Trust in the Balance: Building Successful Organizations on Results, Integrity, and Concern.
- How to Find the Work You Love?
- No Chains Shall Bind Me (The Good Doctors Tales Folio Seven)?
Barth's project is in many ways an attempt to overcome the limitations of classical metaphysics. Among other things, classical metaphysics and it doesn't matter whether you have in mind Eastern and Western models saw the essence of God as an abstract something behind all of God's acts and relations This view is particularly susceptible to Heidegger's critique of "Being. The Cappadocian "Solution" and Further Problem According to the Cappadocians, the Father is both the ground of divinity and a particular hypostasis of that divinity.
Taken together, we can now speak of a quaternity.
Orthodox and Modern: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth
Secondly, the distinctions between the relations are empty of content. What do the words "unbegotten," "begotten," and "proceeding" mean when any analogy between the divine essence and created reality is ruled illegitimate, as the Cappadocians insist Tillich ? The Augustinian-Thomist tradition at least tried to move this forward, even if its solution was equally unsatisfactory. Further, with regard to the Person of Christ, essentialism connotes an abstracted human nature which is acted upon McCormack Further, in essentialist forms of metaphysics the idea of a person is that which is complete in itself apart from its actions and relations A wedge is now driven between essence and existence.
Christologically, this means that nothing which happens in and through the human nature affects the person of the union, for the PErson is already complete anterior to these actions and relations. Election and the Trinity Barth navigates beyond this impasse with his now famous actualism. Rather than first positing a Trinity and then positing a decision to elect, which necessarily creates a metaphysical "gap" in the Trinity, Barth posits Jesus of Nazareth not only as the object of election which is common to every dogmatics scheme , but also the subject of election.
How can this be?
"Orthodox and modern: studies in the theology of Karl Barth" by Bruce L. McCormack
How can someone be both the elector and the elected? To say that Jesus Christ is the electing God is to say that God determined to be God in a second not being used in a temporal sense mode of being Election is the event which differentiates God's modes of being So the event in which God is triune is identical with the event in which He chooses to be God for the human race" ibid.
Participation, not Theosis Barth's actualist ontology allows him to affirm the juridicalism within the Scriptures which is markedly absent from many Eastern treatises and the language of participating in the divine but without recourse to the theosis views so dependent on classical metaphysics. Barth is historically-oriented, not metaphysically. The divine does not metaphysically indwell the human so as to heal the potential loss of being.
Rather, the exaltation occurs in the history of Jesus Christ. For Barth, God's ontology is the act of determining to enter human history God's essence and human essence can be placed in motion--they can be actualized in history. Exaltation, not indwelling The terms describing Jesus's history are agreement, service, obedience--they speak of the man Jesus standing before God, not being indwelt. Reworking the Categories If Barth's criticisms of classical ontology hold, then a humble reworking of some categories is in order.
Instead of hypostasis, Barth uses the term "identification.
See a Problem?
Jesus is God, but God as self-differentiation. This may seem obscure, but it bears great promise. Both East and West have struggled with defining "person. Eastern Orthodox like to say how "personal" their theology is, yet ask them to define "person. Given these huge problems, we should not so quickly dismiss Barth's proposal. Joe rated it really liked it Aug 15, This is a door I chose not to open.
Interpretation is now giving way to a full-blown constructive theological proposal that simply cannot be ignored. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email required Address never made public.
Related Orthodox and Modern: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved